RSS Feed

WIKIPEDIA EXPOSED!!!!!!!

Posted on

WHY DOES WIKIPEDIA HATEAMERICA?!?!?!?!?

THEY ARE BLOCKING PRO-AMERICANS WHO ARE TRYING TO UPDATE THE ENTRY ON PAUL REVERE IN LIGHT OF THE HISTORICAL ANALYSIS AND INSIGHT OFFERED BY SARAH PALIN UNDER THE FULL MANIFEST POWER OF THE DEBORAH ANOINTING!!!!!!

THEY ARE TRYING TO SILENCE AND OBSCURE THE OVERT PRO-SECOND-AMENDMENT MESSAGE OF PAUL REVERE’S MIDNIGHT RIDE!!!!!!

WIKIPEDIA HATES FREEDOM, JUST LIKE GOOGLE/BLOGSPOT AND HAVE NOW BEEN EXPOSED AS NAZI AGENTS OF PIAPS!!!!!!

WAKE UP,AMERICA, AND MAKE THE CONNECTIONS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

5 responses

  1. THEY ARE TRYING TO SILENCE AND OBSCURE THE OVERT PRO-SECOND-AMENDMENT MESSAGE OF PAUL REVERE’S MIDNIGHT RIDE!!!!!!

    – – – –

    Revere’s ride – April, 1775. Revolutionary War still in progress. Founding documents like the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, as yet unwritten.

    Second Amendment [to aforementioned Constitution] – proposed September, 1789. Ratified, December, 1791.

    1775 – 1791 = 16 years

    Nice time-travel trick, there, on Paul’s part.

    How nice it is to have your bottomless humor value back on the Series Of Tubes, Ralphie.

  2. LIBTARD,

    REAL AMERICANS BELIEVE THAT OUR RIGHT ARE DIVINELY BESTOWED.
    SO, DO YOU BELIEVE THAT THERE WAS NO RIGHT TO WORSHIP FREELY, TO ASSEMBLE AND TO SPEAK FREELY BEFORE THE BILL OF RIGHTS?!?!?!

    THE SECOND AMENDMENT CODIFIED WHAT WAS ALREADY A FOUNDING PRINCIPLE AND ALREADY UNDERSTOOD AS A BASIC HUMAN RIGHT!!!!!!!

    STOP HATING AMERICA AND START LEARNING ABOUT HER!!!!!

    BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!

    • Ralph?

      a perfect name for a witless follower of fools and idiots. Sorry Ralphieboy but even America won’t elect a twit President twice (Dubya).

  3. I believe, Fucktard, that you can’t participate in an event that is “overtly pro-anything” that has not yet been codified in a formal, legal manner, because to be in favor of or against something requires that it be articulated in some kind of a public framework. Ergo, Paul Revere could not have been “pro-Second-Amendment,” because his response would have been “Second amendment to WHAT, you ludicrous buffoon?” if you had posed him the question.

    Frankly, I expect he was more worried about the citizens and landowners being overrun with soldiers than he was about ringin’ bells and sending warnin’ shots about people’s firearms, at the time.

    But, by all means, hail your nonexistent Sky God who loves him his guns and his wingnuts like yourself. Cling to your Caribou Barbie’s pronouncements as if they had the weight of solid gold in them. You get funnier by the millisecond.

%d bloggers like this: